Day of DH 2012The Day of DH 2012 is coming! This is a project where digital humanists across the globe report on what they happen to be doing on a particular day – which this year happens to be 27 March – to give a concrete sense of what is involved at the coalface of DH work. There are so many things to like about this project: it embodies the DH ethos of openness and sharing one’s work with as wide an audience as possible; it disregards the hierarchies that are so entrenched in academia, as anyone can participate; and it will create a resource for further study in the form of a dataset of all the posts and images, and no doubt other things such as tweets under the #dayofdh hashtag. (Oh, and I love that among the tags for tagging one’s posts is “DDH-CoffeeHouse”.)

We are somewhat preoccupied in the digital humanities with definitions of our field, something that is perhaps understandable as we are still (perceived as) relatively new to the disciplinary table. I had to come up with a definition of DH as part of my registration, so here’s my attempt:

Digital humanities is a scholarly enterprise which encompasses a field of study, a set of tools, a methodological approach, and a global community, among other things. Digital humanists examine the objects of humanistic study – literature, history, art, language and so forth – using digital tools to carry out the kind of analysis that would be very difficult or impossible to do without the use of technology. Where the value of digital humanities lies, however, is not in the powerful capabilities of the digital tools themselves – as impressive as these may be – but rather in the way that the analyses and visualizations produced by the technology are combined with the skills of critical interpretation, nuanced close analysis, and attentiveness to ambiguity which are born out of a deep grounding in so-called conventional humanities study.

So, what am I likely to be doing on the Day of DH? While I would love to be happily buried in one of my two digital projects (my edition of Canadian modernist correspondence or my digital map of modernist activity in Paris), as it is the last week of the teaching term for us at Strathclyde I will probably instead be answering a raft of emails from students panicking about their exams and final essays, trying to head off at the pass potential tech fails for the public presentations students in the TextLab course will be giving the following day, and in snatched minutes trying to write a conference paper I am giving the following week. In any case, if you’re interested, my small corner of the Day will appear at http://dayofdh2012.artsrn.ualberta.ca/aelang/.

 
A message to my guest bloggers: my wonderful Digital Humanities class

Now that the semester is done, and your marks are all submitted, I wanted to write about the class. This past semester was the very first time Digital Humanities had been taught at the University of Strathclyde, and so I want to take a moment to look back at what worked, what didn’t, and what [...]

 

To say that any current student is able to separate themselves from the realms of digital literacy is unlikely. Since starting university some distant three years ago, technology has been thrust upon me to the point that I am relieved I enjoy using it. In terms of essay-writing and even avoiding essay-writing; the internet is [...]

 

Over the course of the past few weeks, I’ve come to realise that ultimately I really am still in love with good old fashioned close reading.  I love New Criticism, I love the deep relationship between text and reader that it requires and I find a great source of comfort in knowing that everything I [...]

 

This week, I thoroughly enjoyed reading articles with such disperate opinions behind them. I feel, the more of these articles, the more I understand of both points of view, and I’m more able to read in an unbiased, critical way. After reading Googling victorians, one particular section stood out to me: “In his recent memoir, [...]

 

One of the issues surrounding digital humanities that this class has made me very aware of is the debate surrounding the pros and cons of the internet as a tool for scholarly research. I think that the pros are perhaps quite obvious, but there is often a lot of negativity attached to how easily accessible [...]

 

‘Just Google it’ is a phrase I hear and say, daily.  Nicholas Carr makes valid points in his article, “Is google making us stupid?.”  Carr argues that the immediacy and way the information is presented online is changing our daily expectations when taking information.  I cannot agree with this more. There are so many real [...]

 

The internet demonstrates McLuhan’s concept that ‘the medium is the message’, emphasising that because of mediation and the notion of supersession which we discussed in class a few weeks ago, old media must adapt to the forms of new media in order to stay relevant. This is discussed in Flanders (2009) article with reference to [...]

 

Clay Shirky (2010) states that media is nowadays created by “amateurs” who “produce endless streams of mediocrity, eroding cultural norms about quality and acceptability, and leading to increasingly alarmed predictions of incipient chaos and intellectual collapse.” However Shirky also suggests that that the internet is one of many traditions and new technologies introduced throughout history [...]

 

The internet and its limitless sources of information and scholarly tools have undoubtably had an enormous impact on the ways in which we learn. One of the most immediate impacts I feel has affected me is concentration. Yes, when reading a novel of considerable length, the temptation to go online and search the endless archives of information is almost always too tempting. There is [...]

 

Although the internet and computers are blamed for making us lazy and dumb, I am in agreement with Shirkey, when he says that the internet actually restores reading and writing as central activities in our culture (2010). Whilst it can be easy to dismiss the internet, digital humanities is a valuable resource for research in [...]

 

I like illustrations in books, like in Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland and in A Connecticut Yankee is King Arthur’s Court! The author put them to share his vision of scenes he describes and they also play a role on the analisis of the text. So if GIS is -as I understand it- the fact of [...]

 

After reading GIS, Texts and Images:New Approaches by Gregory and Cooper, I came to realise that the most important thing to remember about GIS is that it is meant to assist in distance reading, not close reading.  As others have mentioned, it feels almost unnatural to have a system that creates the images that you [...]

 

As the weeks pass me by, I have gradually developed a wonderful insight into the differing ways in which digital humanities can assist and enhance the exploration of literature. This week, learning about Geographical Information system technology and the concept of being shown a landscape as opposed to creating it in my own mind completely [...]

 

When I read articles like Gregory and Coopers, I feel almost like I’m engaging in a conversation with the writers, as it’s written in accessible language. I often try to pre-empt my own version of positives and negatives on the topic discussed. This time, I struggled to think of any real academic uses for the [...]

 

The tools that I’ve discovered exist this year never fail to surprise me a little each time – Geographical Information System technology is certainly no different. Considering GIS in relation to literature is, in itself, an intriguing concept. It uses a mathematical mapping process in juxtaposition to works of free flowing creativity while interlinking our [...]

 

GIS technology engages with our physical ‘sense of space’ and Bodenhamer’s article relates the technology’s use in the humanities to literature, history and sociology, exploring the concept of psycho-geography and the relationship between literature, culture and place whereby the origins of a piece of work impact the content. Gregory and Cooper focus on the dual [...]

 

What jumped out at me on assimilating this week’s reading, was the sheer excitement of the authors for the use of GIS in the humanities. GIS technologies allow us to visually illustrate information from a text , and which in turn gives us a greater geographical context of what is on the page. Ian Gregory and [...]

 
Ngrams for Political History?

Until this week, I’m sure like the majority of the population, I was totally unaware of Google Books Ngram Viewer. Upon first inspection, like many Google based tools, I was almost instantly aware of how to operate it, and start manipulating the fields to display other information as opposed to the default ‘Atlantis:El Dorado’ search. [...]

 

  Bodenhamer’s article Creating a Landscape of Memory: The Potential of Humanities GIS explores the revolutionary Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tool and its ability, when paired with human history and memory, to create revolutionary ways of mapping data. Bodenhamer interestingly explores the Juxtaposition of areas in which GIS can be utilised with a particular focus [...]

 

Surprisingly, Geographical Information Systems (GIS) – a technology that generates geometric abstractions of the real world that can be mathematically to provide a powerful spatial analytic system (Bodenhamer et al 2007) can chart an author’s literary and emotional response to the text in which they have written. Until now the interpretation of poetry from the [...]

 

The use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in helping to understand and interpret literature is a relatively new idea. It is the understanding of place and memory, and allows us to create maps based on information with society and culture What fascinated me was the story of SAVI (Social Assets and Vulnerability Indicators), and the [...]

 
Ngrams: The Perfect Little Assistant To Life

Basic information that can be assumed from Google Ngrams: Monday being the week commencing the 31st of October 2011, I began my exploration of Google Ngrams by typing in “Halloween’ and searching between the year 1500 and the year 2000. From the results above common sense tells me that ‘Halloween’ originated in the late 1700s. Towards [...]

 

The words ‘Google Ngram Viewer’ were completely foreign to me before preparing for this weeks class. However, after playing with the Ngram viewer for some time and getting used to how it works, I think that it is a pretty excellent tool. I realised that even for someone like me who is not the best with using [...]

 

Typing as somewhat of a technophobe, the word ‘ngram’ stood out to me on the screen like a DNA test on the Jeremy Kyle show. The name doesn’t exactly describe the program or rouse any form of excitement. But after a couple of hours of, firstly, some sensible entries, followed by some rude entries (only [...]

 

This weeks task: ‘explore Google Ngrams Viewer and write a post about what you discover’. Ok so first things first, what do I want to discover?  What can I try and find out that will be interesting or useful for one of my classes?  This was a surprisingly difficult question for me to answer and so [...]

 

What immediately struck me on the first use of Google Ngrams, was simply how easy the tool is to use. The user interface is clean, simple and user-friendly. On first use, I did wonder what to try out. I read all of the ‘rules’ that Google state may lead to an inaccurate result. It appears [...]

 

After reading Michel et al, Crane, and the Culturomics article that was tweeted during the week to supplement our reading, I went on Ngrams and did a search on the terms ‘colour’ and ‘color’ to compare the frequency of both words within the scope that the search provides. Although the terms are homophonic, they are [...]

 
NGrams: The Fame Game

The preparation for this week was to use Google Ngrams and report back with some of our findings. My first impressions of this tool were excellent. Google generally releases tools that have a nice, clean and easy-to-use aesthetic, and this is no different. There is a strange fascination in seeing what words have went in [...]

 

Dan Cohen makes an excellent point. Ngrams is highly addictive. I sat playing with this charming little tool for almost an hour before I realised how long I had been fiddling. However, one commenter on Dan’s article states quite bluntly, ‘I looks to me like a lot of time and effort spent to do something fairly useless. [...]

 

First, thinking of a subject of study. Second, thinking of the key words of this subject. Finally enter these words into google Ngram viewer and have fun! That is how you will maybe discover interesting things and just spend your spare time! That’s how I see this tool : as a kind of scientific widget. [...]

 

The google books N-gram viewer is extremely useful in allowing us to graph the trends of a word that appear in the digitalised books stored online, over a given period of time. Jean-Baptiste Michel argues in Quantitive Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitalised Books that the N-gram viewer is a tool that enables us [...]

 

Google N-Gram viewer is undoubtedly a valuable tool for researchers, particularly those in the field of humanities, and aids the study of cultural trends by quantifying substantial quantities of data immediately and efficiently.  Arguably researchers, such as George Crane (2006), have stated that the N-Grams program and the elements associated with Google books/labs are most impressive [...]

 

In his article ‘What would you do with a million books?’ (2006) Gregory Cane observes that “We must consider the consequences not only for digital libraries but also for the intellectual life of the human race as a whole if the record of human experience becomes, in substantial measure, freely available online anytime and anywhere.”  [...]

 

I realized that when talking about the Digital Humanities, the first word that comes to my mind was “Google” and its collection of data. We talked about “Google maps” in class and we also worked with “Google documents” which was quite a useful and interesting tool which describes perfeclty what sharing things between people and what Digital Humanities [...]

 

References : Gregory Crane, “What Do You Do With a Million Books?” D-Lib Magazine 12.3 (2006). Jean-Baptiste Michel et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books,” Science 331.176 (2011): 176-182. What would we do with a million books? Turn the text into n-grams, and then see how the use of words varies can be seen throughout [...]

 

Patricia Cohen, “Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities’ Riches” Patricia Cohen, “In 500 Billion Words, A New Window on Culture” I am quite inexperienced when it comes to computers and technology, which is one of the main reasons why I decided to take this course. Apart from checking e-mails, using Facebook and researching for classes [...]

 

I initially chose to study Digital Humanities as I did not have much prior knowledge of the subject. The first weeks reading was insightful and really opened my eyes into what Digitial Humanities actually entails.   One of the main points which I found interesting from the reading was how Digital Humanities is used within [...]

 

I chose this class as I had little to no knowledge on how the digital field is helping the humanities. After reading various articles I believe I am beginning to gain a greater understanding of some of the basic terms and arguments for this area. From my reading so far the great excitement in this [...]

 

“The humanities, after all, deal with elusive questions of aesthetics, existence and meaning, the words that bring tears or the melody that raises goose bumps. Are these elements that can be measured?” The way in which Cohen asks the above question suggests, in my opinion, that she doesn’t believe such elements can be measured. I [...]

 

After reading this article, I, like Caitlin, was a little confused as to what digital humanities is as a definition. I now realise the reason I had such problems coming to grips with the concept, is because it is so vast and able to be applied to so many areas of humanities, and in so [...]

 

After reading Patricia Cohen’s “Digital Key’s for unlocking the Humanities’ Riches” it is apparent that the field of Digital Humanities is a hugely powerful and revolutionary movement. This is somewhat emphasised in the vast areas in which it can be utilised for beneficial purposes. The contrast of the areas that it can applied to such [...]

 

Initially I found the article confusing as I did not immediately grasp the concept however on second/third reading I became aware for the first time the possibilities that the technological advances of the past decade have introduced to humanities. I guess it was something I have never really given much thought to, google is something [...]

 

Analyzing Literature by Words and Numbers Published: December 3, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/books/04victorian.html?ref=humanities20   I found this article particularly interesting as it raises both the real use and explosive potential of digital tools in the field of humanities, as well as the drawbacks in a particularly comical way. They state how a researcher was researching the technical [...]

 

“What is Digital Humanities?” from a selection of students with different disciplinary backgrounds, gathered by Paul Fyfe as part of his Introduction to Digital Humanities course at Florida State University. Patricia Cohen, “Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities’ Riches”, New York Times 16 Nov 2010. In all honesty, the first thing that I found both intriguing [...]

 

Patricia Cohen – ‘Digital Key for Unlocking the Humanities Rights’ New York Times 17 Dec 2010. Patricia Cohen – ‘Giving Literature Virtual Life’ New York Times 21 March 2011.   When reading the first article about the use of digital technology in research for the humanities, I was interested in the focus and emphasis that is [...]

 

Patricia Cohen – ‘Digital Key for Unlocking the Humanities Rights’ New York Times 17 Dec 2010. Patricia Cohen – ‘In 500 billion words, New Windows on Culture’  New York Times 17 Dec 2010.   One thing i found interesting from the ‘Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities Rights’ , was how technology was changing the way [...]

 

Digital Humanities – Week One Cohen, Patricia, “In 500 Billion Words, A New Window on Culture,” New York Times 17 Dec 2010. Cohen, Patricia, “Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities’ Riches”, New York Times 16 Nov 2010. The first thing I found most interesting about this week’s reading was how popular the digital databases/tools are [...]

 
Making meaning through digital design

I feel very fortunate in having been able to attend the Digital Humanities Summer Institute in Victoria for a second time with EMiC colleagues, and in having had the opportunity to take part in the first iteration of Meagan Timney’s Digital Editions course as part of DEMiC. Other EMiC-ites have written eloquently about the various [...]

 
Reading between the lines: the Crawley and Livesay archives

Over the past few days I’ve been ensconced in the Queen’s University archives, looking at the papers of Alan Crawley and Dorothy Livesay for my EMiC edition. This is a volume of correspondence between various figures involved in modernism – authors, critics, editors – with the working title Enduring Traces: Correspondence from Canadian Modernism’s Archives. Working [...]

 

I thought those of us who had been to DHSI and who were fortunate enough to take the TEI course with Julia Flanders and Syd Bauman might be interested in a recent interview with Julia, in which she puts the TEI Guidelines and the digital humanities into the wider context of scholarship, pedagogy and the direction [...]

 
TEI, one letter at a time

The project I was working on at DEMiC was a body of correspondence between various figures active in the middle years of the century within Canadian modernism: not only authors but editors, publishers and other figures who participated in the dissemination of modernist aesthetics and artefacts. The letters form part of a volume which currently [...]

 

At lunch today a few of us met to talk with Meagan about strategies for standardising our EMiC projects, including personographies and placeographies, so as to make our various editions as interoperable as possible and to avoid duplicating each others’ labour. By happy chance we were joined by Susan Brown, who mentioned that CWRC is [...]

 

Ever since reading about the Digital Humanities Summer Institute in the Chronicle of Higher Ed as “Summer Camp for Digital Humanists”, I’ve wanted to come here and hang out with a community of people who not only have the sharp critical intelligence borne of literary and humanistic training, but who can also do neat stuff [...]

© 2012 | Anouk Lang | Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha